FT Executive Education Rankings 2020: methodology and key

This is the 22nd version of the Economical Moments rankings of the world’s major suppliers…

This is the 22nd version of the Economical Moments rankings of the world’s major suppliers of customised and open-enrolment government training programmes.

The customised ranking characteristics the major eighty five business educational institutions — these are programs tailor-made to the schooling demands of the organisations that commission them. The next ranking includes the major 75 educational institutions for open-enrolment programmes — programs on precise subject areas, this sort of as management, that are directed towards professionals irrespective of their employer. A 3rd, merged ranking lists the major 50 educational institutions for government training, calculated from the customised and open tables.

Schools using component should be internationally accredited by both Equis or AACSB and have acquired revenues of at least $2m in 2019 from both their customised or open-enrolment non-degree programmes. This year, a total of 107 educational institutions took component in both or equally rankings.

The ranking of customised program suppliers is compiled making use of information from the business educational institutions and their company clientele in 2019. Each and every school should nominate a bare minimum of 20 clientele. At least five of them should entire the FT study for a school to be qualified for the remaining ranking.

The FT study was accomplished by one,one hundred thirty five business school clientele this year — a reaction amount of fifty six for each cent. Each and every rated their programme on a 10-stage scale according to a assortment of indicators. Their solutions directly inform the 1st 10 of the ranking’s standards, from program style and design to comply with-up and foreseeable future use, which account for a merged 80 for each cent of the ranking’s pounds.

Customer responses are weighted according to programme type. Purchasers select just one of 3 options to categorise their programme: strategic (shipped to major management and made to affect a company’s way) standard (shipped to management on operational facets of a company) or practical (similar to a precise functionality, this sort of as marketing and advertising). Strategic programmes have the greatest weighting and as a result the greatest affect on the ranking.

Responses are also weighted according to the seniority of the unique liable for specifying the program, the sizing of the client organisation and the amount of educational institutions with which that client has commissioned customised programs in the earlier 3 many years.

The past five standards are calculated from info supplied by educational institutions on worldwide clientele, abroad programmes, growth, companion educational institutions and faculty variety.

The open-enrolment ranking is compiled making use of information from program suppliers and folks who accomplished their nominated management programmes in 2019. Schools post one or two standard programs of at least 3 days in duration and just one or two state-of-the-art programs of at least five days. At least 20 for each cent of these programmes’ members should entire the FT study, with a bare minimum of 20 accomplished surveys, for a school to be viewed as in the remaining ranking.

A total of 5,480 members answered this year’s open programme study — a reaction amount of 37 for each cent — ranking components of their program on a 10-stage scale. Responses by state-of-the-art and standard-amount members are merged to calculate the 1st 10 ranking standards.

These standards, which consist of the quality of the members, of the educating and the relevance of the skills they received, inform 80 for each cent of the ranking. Faculty information are used to calculate the remaining standards on female and worldwide members, growth, worldwide location and companion educational institutions.

For equally rankings, info gathered in the preceding two many years is used, where readily available, to calculate standards informed by client and participant responses. If a school has participated for the earlier 3 many years, the weighting is forty:33:27, with 2020 information counting for forty for each cent. If two many years of info is readily available, the weighting is 55:forty five, with 2020 information accounting for 55 for each cent.

The weightings accorded to the 1st 9 and 10 standards in the customised and open rankings, respectively, are decided by the amount of relevance clientele and members connect to just about every in their surveys for the 2020 ranking. Weightings for these standards as a result differ a little from year to year.

Schools that characteristic in equally rankings are qualified for the merged over-all ranking. The major 50 educational institutions are calculated according to an equal weighting of the total scores accomplished in equally rankings, rather than an common of ranking positions.

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s database specialist

Important: Customised-enrolment programme

(weights for ranking standards are shown in brackets as a share of the over-all ranking)

The 1st 10 standards, up to and which includes “Future use”, are based on information from the corporations that commissioned government programs.

The subsequent five are based on information noted by business educational institutions. Schools are ranked for just about every of these standards. The past category, “Total responses‡”, is for info only and does not inform the ranking.

Figures in brackets clearly show the pounds just about every criterion contributes to the over-all ranking. The weighting accorded to the 1st 9 standards, from planning to price for cash, accounts for 80 for each cent of the total ranking’s pounds. It is decided by the level of relevance that clientele connect to just about every.

Preparing (eight.3): amount of conversation amongst client and school, the extent to which clients’ ideas had been integrated into the programme, and the effectiveness of the school in integrating its hottest analysis.

Programme style and design (eight.4): versatility of the program and the willingness of educational institutions to complement their faculty with exterior industry experts.

Teaching procedures and materials (seven.nine): extent to which educating procedures and materials had been modern and proper, and bundled a appropriate combine of tutorial rigour and simple relevance.

College (eight.4): high-quality of educating and the extent to which educating workers labored jointly to existing a coherent programme.

New skills and studying (eight.3): relevance of skills received to the place of work, the relieve with which they had been implemented, and the extent to which the course encouraged new ways of pondering.

Abide by-up (seven.3): extent and effectiveness of comply with-up made available just after the program members returned to their workplaces.

Aims accomplished (eight.4): extent to which tutorial and business expectations had been met, and the high-quality of opinions from unique members to program commissioners.

Services (seven.4): ranking of the studying environment’s high-quality and ease, and of supporting assets and amenities.

Worth for cash (seven.seven): clients’ ranking of the programme’s style and design, educating and materials in conditions of price for cash.

Long term use (eight.): probability that clientele would reuse the exact school for other customised programmes in the foreseeable future, and regardless of whether they would recommission the exact programme.

Global clientele (5.): based on the share of clientele with headquarters outside the house the business school’s foundation state and location.

Abroad programmes (2.): worldwide get to of the school’s customised programme educating.

Expansion (5.): based on the over-all growth in revenues from customised programmes as very well as the growth in revenues from repeat business.

Lover educational institutions (3.): amount and high-quality of programmes created or taught in conjunction with other Equis or Affiliation to Progress Collegiate Schools of Organization (AACSB) accredited business educational institutions.

College variety (5.): variety of school faculty according to citizenship and gender.

Whole responses: amount of unique surveys accomplished by the school’s clientele. Figures in brackets suggest the amount of many years of study information counted towards the ranking.

Important: Open up-enrolment programme

(weights for ranking standards are shown in brackets as a share of the over-all ranking)

The 1st 10 standards are based on information from programme members the subsequent 6 are based on information submitted by the business educational institutions. Ranks are shown for just about every of these standards, apart from “Female participants”, which demonstrates the share. Figures in brackets clearly show the pounds just about every criterion contributes to the over-all ranking. The weighting accorded to the 1st 10 standards, from planning to amenities, accounts for 80 for each cent of the total ranking’s pounds. It is decided by the amount of relevance that members attach to just about every.

Preparing (seven.seven): provision of state-of-the-art info on programme content material, and the participant collection method.

Program style and design (eight.6): versatility of the program and appropriateness of class sizing, structure and style and design.

Teaching procedures and materials (eight.3): extent to which educating procedures and materials had been modern and proper, and bundled a appropriate combine of tutorial rigour and simple relevance.

College (eight.seven): high-quality of the educating and the extent to which educating workers labored jointly to existing a coherent programme.

Quality of members (seven.nine): extent to which other members had been of the proper managerial and tutorial regular, the worldwide variety of members and the high-quality of conversation among peers.

New skills and studying (eight.seven): relevance of skills received to the place of work, the relieve with which they had been implemented, and the extent to which the program inspired new ways of pondering.

Abide by-up (seven.3): amount of comply with-up made available just after members returned to their workplaces, and networking alternatives with fellow members.

Aims accomplished (eight.4): extent to which individual and professional expectations had been met, and the probability that members would endorse the programme.

Foods and accommodation (6.eight): ranking of the high-quality of food and accommodation.

Services (seven.6): ranking of the studying environment’s high-quality and ease, and of supporting assets and amenities.

Female members (2.): share of female program members.

Global members (3.): based on the share of members from outside the house the business school’s foundation state and location.

Global location (2.): extent to which programmes are operate outside the house the school’s foundation state and location.

Expansion (5.): based on the over-all growth in revenues from open programmes as very well as the growth in revenues from repeat business.

Lover educational institutions (3.): amount and high-quality of programmes taught in conjunction with other Equis or AACSB accredited business educational institutions.

College variety (5.): variety of school faculty according to citizenship and gender.